British
4"/45 (10.2 cm) BL Marks IX and X
Updated 19 July 2006

Admiral Fisher had always objected to heavy secondary batteries on capital ships, so, at his insistence, the 4" (10.2 cm) caliber was chosen for the secondary weapons on the battlecruisers of the Repulse and Courageous classes.  Initially, either the 4" (10.2 cm) QF Mark V or the 4" (10.2 cm) BL Mark VIII were to have been installed, but the first weapon was difficult to arrange for director firing and the second had a low rate of fire.  The best features of both, the Mark V body and the Mark VIII breech mechanism, were combined to create the Mark IX.

The battlecruisers used both single and triple mountings, with the latter having the guns individually sleeved, an unusual feature for a secondary weapon.  This mounting required a very large crew of 32 and, as it lacked power assist, proved to be quite cumbersome.

During World War II, this weapon was used in single mountings on many corvettes as well as on numerous smaller ships.

Mark IX was of wire wound construction with tapered inner A tube and jacket.  Mark IX* differed in having no inner A tube.  Mark IX** had no inner A tube, a B tube and overlapping short jacket and an old-style wire-winding method.  All had Welin breech blocks with Vickers mechanisms.  Some 2,382 were built.  Actual bore length was 44.35 calibers.

The Mark X was originally built for the Norwegian Nidaros class coastal defense ships which were taken over at the start of World War I.  These were of Elswick Pattern T and were partly wire wound with coned breech block.  Fifteen guns were built and were used only on DAMS.

The data that follows is specifically for the Mark IX, but the ballistics for the Mark X were similar.

WNBR_4-45_mk9_Renown_pic.jpg

Amidships Detail of HMS Renown showing two of the triple mountings
Note that the gun barrels could be independently elevated in these mountings

WNBR_4-45_mk9_Renown_fwd_pic.jpg

One of the forward triple mountings on HMS Renown
In the lower left corner is one of the single 4"/45 (10.2 cm) BL Mark IX guns

WNBR_4-45_mk9_Dianthus_pic.jpg

HMS Dianthus
Typical 4"/45 (10.2 cm) Mark IX on Flower Class Corvette
IWM Photograph

WNBR_4-45_mk9_Sir_John_Moore_pic.jpg

4"/45 (10.2 cm) Mark IX on Monitor HMS Sir John Moore
Note the shaded light on top of the shield, which was useful during night firings

.
Gun Characteristics
.
Designation 4"/45 (10.2 cm) BL Mark IX and Mark X
Ship Class Used On Mark IX
   World War I
      Renown and Courageous classes
      Inflexible as rearmed

   World War II
      Flower Corvettes, Bathurst Minesweepers and a variety of smaller ships
 

Mark X
   DAMS

Date Of Design About 1913
Date In Service 1916
Gun Weight Without Breech Mechanism:  4,620 lbs. (2,096 kg)
Gun Length oa 184.6 in (4.689 m)
Bore Length 177.4 in (4.506 m)
Rifling Length 149.4 in (3.795 m)
Grooves (32) 0.037 in deep x 0.270 (0.94 x 6.86 mm)
Lands 0.1227 in (3.117 mm)
Twist Uniform RH 1 in 30
Chamber Volume 470.3 in3 (7.707 dm3)
Rate Of Fire 10 - 12 rounds per minute
.
Ammunition
.
Type Bag
Projectile Types and Weights HE 1920 - 22 lbs. (10 kg)
HE 1940 - 31 lbs. (14.1 kg)
SAP - N/A
Bursting Charge N/A
Projectile Length N/A
Propellant Charge World War I:  7.7 lbs. (3.5 kg) MD16
World War II:  7.9 lbs. (3.59 kg) SC103 or 9.39 lbs. (4.3 kg) NF/S164-048
Muzzle Velocity 2,625 fps (800 mps)
Working Pressure 18.5 tons/in2 (2,910 kg/cm2)
Approximate Barrel Life 3,600 rounds
Ammunition stowage per gun N/A
Notes:

1) SAP was 3crh.

2) Outfits included up to 100 star shells per ship.

.
Range
.
Elevation With 22 lbs. (10 kg) HE Shell
Range @ 30 degrees 13,500 yards (12,344 m)
Elevation With 31 lbs. (14.1 kg) HE Shell
Range @ 30 degrees 13,840 yards (12,660 m)
.
Mount / Turret Data
.
Designation Triple Mount
   Renown (5) and Courageous (6):  T.I. Mark I

Single Mount
   Renown (2):  CPI
   Smaller ships (1):  CPI

Weight  T.I. Mark I (less shield):  17.475 tons (17.755 mt)
CPI:  4.721 tons (4.797 mt)
Elevation -10 / +30 degrees
Elevation Rate Manually operated, only
Train 360 degrees
Train Rate Manually operated, only
Gun recoil N/A
Note:  As mentioned above, the triple mount was a clumsy design.  Quoting from "The Loss of Repulse and Prince of Wales" by A.E. Jacobs:  "The triple mountings were always extremely difficult to train, and the general procedure when moving through a large arc was for the two trainers at the 'normal' and 'director' training wheels to be assisted by the remainder of the crew pushing on the breeches or muzzles."
.
Data from
"Big Gun Monitors:  The History of the Design, Construction and Operation of the Royal Navy's Monitors" by Ian Buxton
"Naval Weapons of World War Two" and "British Naval Guns 1880-1945 No 17" article in "Warship Volume X" both by John Campbell
"British Battleships of World War Two" by Alan Raven and John Roberts